I received an email from Smashwords this week, because I publish erotica with them and they have received instructions from PayPal that they can no longer publish content with rape, bestiality and incest (including pseudo incest). Now, those of us who don't write those particular sub types of erotica may think, oh well, doesn't apply to me, so, ho hum, let's just ignore it. However, this is the thin end of the wedge! (BTW, I will add here, that it is not PayPal who came up with these new rules, it was credit card companies, banks and credit unions)
Where the hell did financial institutions get the idea they
could introduce their own brand of censorship?! They don't make laws, they make
money and last time I checked, writing about rape, bestiality or incest is not
illegal (I won't cast my own moral judgement on it, because I haven't read every
single book with it in, so I don't think I would make a fair judgement). These
companies have no legal leg to stand on when trying to control the output of
authors, so why should they get away with suddenly strong arming content
providers like this? What next? Amex telling Marks and Spencers they can't sell
skimpy lingerie because it may cause a gentleman to have improper thoughts?!
What these companies are doing is censorship, pure and simple.
Smashwords is not to blame in this, they are being threatened
with removal of their payment system if they don't comply: blackmail in any
other terms. They are doing their best to negotiate the least restrictive
outcome. Still, all this makes me angry, very angry, as you may have gathered
from my tone above. When we allow a group of businessmen to go above the law
and impose their own set of arbitrary restrictions, we are allowing some
unknown puppet master behind these decisions to dictate what only elected
governments should be able to control, freedom of speech.
Australia has laws about the age of participating
individuals in erotica, over 18: being British, I may think they're draconian,
but they are laws and I will respect them. These credit card companies have
only profit driving them. These people didn't even try the SOPA route of
getting their whims into law, they went the backdoor. Personally, I don't think
this is right. They are using their position of relative monopoly in their
industries to push a censorship agenda that it is not their place to be pushing.
Given their current targets, we should be burning the Greek/Roman Myths along
with the indie erotica, since dear old Zeus raped his way through his conquests
and was known to take the form of an animal while doing it.
Anyway, whatever we think about the current censorship
targets for these companies, censorship is still censorship, they're
effectively burning books, just because they're made of virtual words does not
make it any less barbaric than if they'd made a pyre outside the local library.
We have to let these companies know we do not approve. We need to contact our
credit card companies and our politicians and let them know we don't think
financial institutions should not be in the censorship business. We need spread the word far and wide that we,
as readers and writers, do not want finance controlling our imaginations.
Tweet it, blog it, tell the media – we don't want business
censoring legal works of fiction!
Edit - found a good post by Huffington Post about this. Plus a petition.
Edit - found a good post by Huffington Post about this. Plus a petition.
So, I guess you can't but The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (two graphic scenes or rape) or The Kite Runner or heck, even Tess of the D'urbervilles?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ManOfLaBook.com
Exactly - the question is where would they draw their own arbitrary line. Will they only want to ban it if the book is listed in the erotica section with a rape scene in it, or any book that has rape in it? How does one test for whether the rape is meant to shock or titillate, if it's in a horror book, is that horror or erotica, especially if it is from the pov of the bad guy? Is a book put out by an indie author automatically considered bad, but one by a 'reputable' publisher can get away with it? I don't want to have to sit and think as a writer about the story I am writing just because a credit card company has come up with a bunch of arbitrary rules.
Deletetry looking into Wepay its an alternative to paypal and many Regretsians are backing it already. all it needs is more publicity.
ReplyDeletePaypal already encourage the destruction of antique violins after all...
Ive not read Wepays fine print yet, they have a twitter but as far as i know an internet search engine will be able to find them.
on my mobile at the moment and cant copy links and whatnot at the moment unfortunately
Corporations are the new law. The don't just want to censor ideas they want to tell us what to think. If they could sanitized history by rewriting it they would. They are of course starting their campaign with topics that hysterical parents find abhorrent but they will not stop there. The goal is to control thought eventually turning all fiction into white washed vanilla stories devoid of passion or compassion but full of marketing cues designed to use morality and quasi-religion to sell product.
ReplyDeleteCorporations are the new law. The don't just want to censor ideas they want to tell us what to think. If they could sanitized history by rewriting it they would. They are of course starting their campaign with topics that hysterical parents find abhorrent but they will not stop there. The goal is to control thought eventually turning all fiction into white washed vanilla stories devoid of passion or compassion but full of marketing cues designed to use morality and quasi-religion to sell product.
ReplyDelete